Education Sector HotlineJune 16, 2017 DPS World Foundation barred from piggybacking on Delhi Public School’s reputationThis article was originally published on 11th of May 2017, Daily edition of The Delhi Public School Society has run schools and educational institutions in Delhi and throughout India under the name Delhi Public School since 1948. It has successfully established 11 core schools in India and is affiliated with 170 schools in India and 15 schools worldwide, which comprise approximately 300,000 students. The Delhi Public School Society is the registered proprietor of the trademark DPS, which covers several relevant classes except Class 41, for which registration is still pending. It also applied for registration of the trademark DELHI PUBLIC SCHOOL (in Classes 16, 35, 36, 41 and 42) on March 8 2011. The Delhi Public School Society also uses two crest logos. One – a registered trademark, which it has claimed to use since 1948 – comprising of a hand holding a torch, the school motto “Service before Self” and the words “Delhi Public School” written inside a shield. The other – a logo adopted in 1996 – comprising of a torch on a book along with the school motto written inside a shield surrounded by a creeper and the words “Delhi Public School” written below. DPS World Foundation is a trust whose founder was a life member of the Delhi Public School Society until October 17 2015 and its president from 1994 to 2004. The Delhi Public School Society alleged that DPS World Foundation was operating in the same market under the trademark DPS WORLD FOUNDATION, which conflicted with its mark. Further, the Delhi Public School Society alleged that DPS World Foundation had used a crest deceptively similar to one of Delhi Public School’s crests. The plaintiff became aware of the defendant’s conflicting mark in July 2015. A show cause notice was immediately served by the Delhi Public School Society calling on DPS World Foundation’s founder to illustrate why an action should not be taken against him for having clandestine association with the creation of the defendant trust and the adoption of the disputed trademarks. Subsequently, the Delhi Public School Society filed a suit against DPS World Foundation and its founder for infringement and passing off. At the interim stage, the Delhi High Court observed that the trademark DPS was the Delhi Public School Society’s registered trademark under the Trademark Act 1999 and that the use of the word DPS in the trade name DPS World Foundation and DPS World School infringed the plaintiff’s rights under Section 29 of the act. However, the court rejected the contention that DPS World Foundation’s crest was identical to that of the plaintiff. The defendants filed an appeal against the interim order. During the appeal, DPS World Foundation and its founder contended that:
The Delhi Public School Society contented that:
not registered in Class 41, the Delhi Public School Society could not be barred from claiming common law protection of its trademark, especially in view of the fact that it was registered in Classes 16, 35, 36 and 42. Thus, DPS World Foundation and its use of DPS in its trade name was an infringement under Section 29 of the Trademarks Act. Further, the court held that while no Delhi Public School Society school had ever been called DPS, the term DPS is an acronym of Delhi Public School used for the purpose of convenience and no evidence was found that any harm to its reputation or goodwill had been caused by the adoption of the infringing trademark. DPS was found to be the Delhi Public School Society’s registered trademark and was therefore entitled to statutory protection. Lastly, it was found that the trademark DELHI PUBLIC SCHOOL was not registered and contained separate words ‘Delhi’ ‘Public’ and ‘School’, in respect of which the plaintiff could not seek exclusive rights for passing-off purposes. As a result, it was found that DPS World Foundation could adopt a trade name including the words ‘Delhi’ ‘Public’ and ‘School’, but could not use the registered trademark DPS in any manner whatsoever. DisclaimerThe contents of this hotline should not be construed as legal opinion. View detailed disclaimer. |
|